At 08:27 13/06/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>As some of you may know, over on JR's raw list there has been some recent
>postings regarding  NFL's plagiarism-specifically the role of David Wolf.
>Perhaps some of you will remember Ward Nicholson's  post regarding a David
>Wolf's post titled  Science or Science.  Ward meticulously demonstrated
>Science or Science to be plagiarized from  Phillip Johnson's book Darwin
>On Trial.
>In the Natures First Law's catalog  there is a essay for sale, supposedly
>written by David Wolf, titled On Form and Actuality: A Refutation on the
>theory of Evolution and Adaptation. Does anyone know if this the same as
>David Wolfs science on science post?
>
>Also,is there a final figure on how much of  Natures First Law is a
>plagiarized from Raw Eating. ?
>
>Thanks In Advance
>Roy Siegel

hello all.

after some two years, i have to say this:

why are so many of you SO fascinated with the plagiarism thing? i am
not
too wise, but the well-known psychological and new agey theory has it
that
whatever you react strongly to or whatever particularly touches you is
merely a reflection of something inside of you. i mean that whoever
reacts
to plagiarism and to theft, etc, has some unresolved emotional issue
with
it.

i wanted to comment this because i keep being amazed at the incredible
amount of discussion about plagiarism in a raw food list!! it is like
many
of you guys really have a problem with it. i am not condoning it, of
course
not, but honestly i do not care about it in this case. like, who is
doing
more to help people, most of you guys or the nfl guys?

i would be glad to hear anyone's comments about the reason to talk so
lenghty about this (for me) non-issue.

regards,

axel makaroff