BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"BP - His DNA is this long." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Met History <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:04:16 EDT
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
"BP - His DNA is this long." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Take a typical "properly funded" preservation project - after the
conservators, the riggers, the technicians, the archaeologists, the funders,
the boomers, the architects are finished, it has an unmistakeable stamp,
redolent of its age - whether it's 1960's preservation, like the Jefferson
Market Courthouse (where the interiors were ripped out) or 1990's preservation
(like the US Custom House).

I can't finger it yet (big thoughts required here) but the impulse to
preserve, even by the most sincerely motivated, low budget homeowner, is very
frequently marked by the desire to leave a stamp on something - like adding
vinyl siding or, even, demolishing something.

Christopher Gray
Office for Metropolitan History

ATOM RSS1 RSS2