Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:07:06 -0600 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Vicki, when posting please identify the people whose messages you are quoting.
>>"Extreme" means by definition differing from the majority. All raw diets are
>>extreme, especially the 100% raw ones, the vegan ones, and the ones
including
>>raw meat. With 95%+ raw, I consider myself as extreme, although not at the
>very far end.
Vicki:
>Consider the fact that 99.999% of all living organisms on this planet are
100% raw eaters -- are they all extreme too?
It is true that a 100% raw diet is not extreme when comparing to the diet
of other living organisms on the planet, but seen in the light that
humankind has evolved on a semi-cooked, omnivorous diet, then a 100 % raw,
vegan diet does seem quite extreme.
>>> I don't agree with that. I think that on the contrary you can do fine
>>> with RAF for a while, but it's gonna catch up with you sonner or later.
>>I have read that "argument" many times, and I won't believe it until someone
>>gives me a convincing proof (you didn't supply any proof here).
Vicki:
>Zephyr.
Zephyr getting sick from eating raw, mongoose liver is a poor argument for
not eating RAF. It would like be staying away from greens because some
herbs are poisonous.
Best, Peter
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|