Well, Lee (good to hear from you, BTW), I don't know about all that other
stuff; some I believe, some I'd like to see proof of.  But I am reading as
much as I can about the health effects of sugar and I find it a little
disconcerting that these authors have no trouble quoting studies proving
that sugar is dangerous, studies going back 75 years, and yet all is quiet
on the sugar front.  The history of sugar is rife with examples of
well-meaning people who tried to get the word out who were discredited or
otherwise silenced.  There's simply too much profit to be made for the
masses to be allowed to learn that sugar (and processed foods in general)
is killing them as surely as a bullet.

(Way to stire it up and split!)

Take care,
John Pavao

----------
Hi there John,

     I see you're still stalking those black helicopters.  :-)
Interesting list this.  btw you so-called conspiracy theorists, stop
apologizing for presenting thoughts that need to be considered.  The
conspiracy of silence in the face of recognized danger is a greater
threat than the organized attempts at control.  Yeah, I'm a conspiracy
theorist.  However, I like to call myself a populist, sounds so much
neater and PC.  Remember, there is no such thing as communism.  There is
no such thing as La cosa nostra, the mafia.  Covert operations are all
sanctioned by the President and our congressional members know at all
times what is going on in the basement of the white house.  Nafta is not
a step towards one world government, neither is European
Unification.George Bush was just using poetic license when referring to
a new world order.  And a single gunman was responsible for the death of
JFK.  Now, I gotta have me some peppered jerky to fire myself up before
bedtime.  Nice meetin' ya'll.

Lee Rodgers