Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 25 Jul 1998 11:45:58 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Amadeus Schmidt wrote:
>
>> But of course a healtier population will be able to reproduce better,
>> and be able to defend better. Compared to another dense populated society.
>
Todd Moody wrote:
>
>No, this is false. A healthy population of hunter-gatherers will
>*not* be able to reproduce better, because a grain based diet
>massively increases the reproductive rate. Furthermore,
>agricultural societies, being more stable, will eventually
>develop superior weaponry to what hunter-gatherers can manage.
>HGs are stronger and healthier, but numbers and weapons will
>ultimately decide who wins.
Also, it seems that it would be a lot harder to fight a war if you had to
take time out to hunt and gather your food.
Binnie
|
|
|