Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 1997 19:16:01 -0500 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Mara Riley wrote:
> To the (very little) extent that I understand the principles of the
> ToS, I disagree with them.
Not to start a Holy War, but I agree 10000000000000000000000
fold about disagreeing 10000000000000000000000000000 fold with the ToS.
> I think I'd reserve the 'most vicious' category for sharks.
O.K. WIth a shark we have what Satanists would consider a
morally perfect animal. He is a vicious eater, with a vicious apitite.
He may be "evil" to seals and even to people he eats, but he is just a
little fishy doing what fishies do. With a human being we have a person
who will kill not for food, but for "sport." We have a species that will
gladly and willingly distroy it's habitat for some perverse ideal of
"progress." We have a species that will break the spine of it's own
children on it's knee. True, we also have some very good people in our
species, but we have some very, very bad. I know of no other species
that has such a thing as a serial killer.
|
|
|