Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jun 1995 21:24:19 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Submitted to veg-raw by "Thomas E. Billings" <[log in to unmask]>
> Wheat sprouts that have drowned and are decaying in water (rejuvelac)
> will not grow if planted; regular wheat sprouts will grow. In a FF,
> the base food eventually dies; the only living part is the bacteria
> culture that is growing on the base food. The subject question can be
> restated as: does a living bacteria culture on a dead/dying base
> qualify as a "living food"?
> Is sprout milk yogurt different from other fermented foods?
> * yogurt (dairy yogurt) is considered "sattvic" - balancing, soothing,
> by yoga/Ayurveda. It is the only sattvic FF, all others are tamasic.
I've been making yogurt using soya milk as the medium ( i managed to get
some soya milk based live yogurt as a first starter). Would this be
considered as "sattvic" ( balancing / soothing ) by yogic/Ayurvedic
thought ?
I use rejuvelac as a by-product of the wheat sprouting process , i
soak the wheat for a day and use the water , and then i continue
the wheat sprouting process , eating the sprouts in the next day or
two ( i find wheat grass too sweet for my liking). Assuming that
"true rejuvalac" can be made this way, how does this relate with the
point that rejuvalac is a dead food , after all the wheat goes on
to sprout.
A (simple) question. Is sprout milk just liquidised sprouts ?
Finally , an idea about a sprout milk yogurt assuming it is what i
think sprout milk is. Add a lacto bacteria culture to the sprout
milk medium.
I have not tried this, comment welcome.
Alex Tarry
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|