>
>Actually, I didn't say that. Nor did I imply it. I'm guessing they were a
>lot healthier before the modern diet reached them, though. One reason for
>so guessing is that with current rates of IDDM, a lot of them wouldn't
>survive to reproduce. Have you looked at the studies demonstrating a
>significant link between celiac disease and IDDM?
>
><underline>

Ron, or somebody else, please explain celiac disease and IDDM.  Thanks.

 I am
>zealous on the issue of wheat, rye and barley. Your can come after me
>there, if you want. I think I can do a very good job of defending my
>claim that gluten is a pathogen for 20% to 30% of the population.


I'm beginning to feel that the grain issue is a big one and is overlooked
by the medical profession and mainstream science, and that the truth is
coming out in places like this mailing list.  Still, caution needs to
taken....remember how sure everyone was that margarine was better than
butter, and at a fraction of the cost!
Paul Getty
Morehead City, NC
[log in to unmask]