Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:05:50 -0300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 14:09 20/03/1999 EST, you wrote:
>In a message dated 3/20/99 1:10:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
><< a more "experiential" approach of what we are learning thru that list is
> more interesting to me than what opinions we are defending against who. >>
>
>Yes. I agree. I would like it if people would share more of their own
>anectdotal experiences with their version of a raw food diet, as well as any
>more scientific data they can share (eg blood tests,hair analysis etc.) Also
>whatever health problems people have overcome and their theories about what
>worked for them would be much appreciated.
>
>
>Love
>Sandy
>
i completely agree with the above, and actually had been feeling like
saying it myself lately.
this list is very very interesting and exciting to me, but IMHO, it would
be even more so if there were more real life stuff and less scholar talk
about nutrients, etc. i do not mean that the theory is not important, no,
only that real experiences are important too but do not appear as much as i
would like. anyway...
regards,
axel makaroff
|
|
|