RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dariusz ROZYCKI <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:11:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Kirt:
> Other useful foods may have very little smell (grapes, fish bones, etc.)
> but still taste good. And I have times when a food (bananas, sweet corn)
> smelled nuetral but tasted great. In the case of the latter, they may
> simply be oversweet foods, but even so they are the foods which are in our
> markets, so relying exclusively on smell/taste for attractions and the
> taste change for quantity can be problematic. What the solution is is an
> open question--wide open...;)

Dariusz:
Oh!  What a shame I just released my daily list of puzzles... :)

Well, you know, if the above, completely chaotic, unclear and confused
(by the very nature of the matter, mind you; not by you personally)
paragraph you wrote is a good indication of what reality looks like, then
instinctos are in for a very rough ride.

In fact, by what measure then do you claim to be an "instincto?" (Again,
don't think I care much for the term itself; it's the principles behind it.)
How do you go 'bout you daily eating routines then, when you don't seem
able to rely to rely on your instincts any more than a cooked-fooder or a
rawist?

Gosh!  Just when I thought I had it all figured out...
I feel like chasing a rabbit now... (and that ain't for the exercise-of-it)

Anyway, catch you later (well, not "catch" literally)... ;)


ATOM RSS1 RSS2