Yes, I see your point. Let me rephrase my question. Should free speech causing
emotional, psychological or mental (not brain) harm be excluded? Dan
Lawrence Libby wrote:
> Such material certainly could precipitate bodily harm.
>
> Dan Koenig wrote:
>
> > Bodily harm only? Does this allow the distribution of racist, fascist, or
> > pedophiliac comic books to primary grade school children? Dan
> >
> > Lawrence Libby wrote:
> >
> > > As they teach you in 4th grade, free speech should be limited only by public
> > > safety. But, of course, it gets more complicated than that in the real
> > > world. Who gets to define "public safety"? Does it apply only to bodily
> > > safety? (Apparently not.) If I were king of the world (or got to cast the
> > > deciding vote:) ) the line would be bodily harm only.