Doesn't it all hinge on whether a 'one-world-government' is a top down
imposition, as government traditionally is, or, alternatively, a bottom-(up)
mechanism for individuals and communities to join in collective policy
making on a macro scale?

b

bruce sandford
Private Bag MBE 163
Hamilton 2001
Aotearoa - New Zealand

ICQ: 20816964
Fax: USA(707)215-6524

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Issodhos @aol.com
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 3:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CHOMSKY] Unlimited numbers of guns
>
>
> In a message dated 7/18/99 6:15:11 PM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > > p.s. a one world government is simply a super nation-state and its
> policing
> >  > would be even more vicious than many nations are now used to.
> >
> >  yeah but at least the people of the world could stand united
> in bringingit
> >  down...
> >
> >  dan
> >
>
>     And replace it with what?  And what makes you think "the people" would
> stand united against anything?:-)
> Yours,
> Issodhos
>
>