Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 3 May 1997 10:06:03 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I also posted a request/proposal for making a determination of what action
we should take, and developing a plan to take it, yesterday. Any replys?
- Don DeBar
----------
> From: Juan Carlos Garelli <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: The State, definitions & all else
> Date: Saturday, May 03, 1997 8:36 AM
>
> In a message dated 3 May 97 at 6:50, Bob Smith says:
>
> > After a short stay with the Chomsky group, I must bid a fond
> > farewell. I subscribed in the hope of finding a group that was
> > translating Chomsky's ideas into action. Instead I found some
> > people (I mean this as a constructive critique) engaged in a kind
> > of cerebral circle-jerk akin to the medieval scholars who debated
> > how many angels could stand on the head of a pin. The mass of
> > mankind is not interested in the fine points of libertarian
> > socialism, rightist libertarianism, anarchosyndicalism etc. or
> > sociogeneticism (if I may stretch the English language). They are
> > looking for a way to make their lives better.
>
> I heartily second Bob's words. My own postings about seeking a way to
> set a resource to provide more maternal care than what is extant
> today have been ignored, as if I was talking on a topic alien to
> CHOMSKY list. Bob is right, what's the use of chatting about
> anarchosyndicalism and propose nothing to set into action? Nil.
>
> JC Garelli
>
> Juan Carlos Garelli, M.D., Ph.D.
> Department of Early Development
> Attachment Research Center
> University of Buenos Aires
|
|
|