At 11:55 AM 4/29/97 -0500, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
>First, I feel that homo sapiens is the only species on earth whose
>ability to live is primarily conceptual rather than genetic. By this
>I mean that human adaptive systems are learned rather than
>genetically stored. This gives an enormous amount of adaptive
>flexibility to this particular species. A deer must grow a coat of
I have quite have a different view of humanity. Modern evolutionary
theory argues that humans were selected to be the best at getting
their genes into the next generation. In other words, best at
exploitation[1] and deception[2].
I see the vast bulk of social theories as merely ways to rationalize
what we are genetically programmed to do. Moreover, we are still
totally dependent on our natural life-support system.
Jay
------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Exploit: To employ to the greatest possible advantage.
[2] In the late 50s, the social scientist Erving Goffman made
a stir with a book called THE PRESENTATION OF SELF IN
EVERYDAY LIFE, that stressed how much time we all spend
on stage, playing to one audience or another. Goffman
marveled that sometimes a person is "sincerely convinced
that the impression of reality which he stages is the real
reality."
What modern evolution theory brings to Goffman's
observation is an explanation of the practical function
of self-deception: we deceive ourselves in order to deceive
others better. In his foreword to Richard Dawkins' THE
SELFISH GENE, Robert Trivers noted Dawkins' emphasis on the
role of deception in animal life and added, in a much-cited
passage, that if indeed "deceit is fundamental to animal
communication, then there must be strong selection to spot
deception and this ought, in turn, to select for a degree of
self-deception, rendering some facts and motives unconscious
so as not to betray -- by the subtle signs of self-knowledge
-- the deception being practiced." Thus, "the conventional
view that natural selection favors nervous systems which
produce ever more accurate images of the world must be a
very naive view of mental evolution." pp. 263-264,
THE MORAL ANIMAL ,Robert Wright; Pantheon, 1994;
ISBN 0-679-40773-1.
|