Well, I suppose I could try to debate you...but I guess you are probably
correct. I will openly admit I was wrong. I just wish, however, you could be
less insulting and more mature when discussing such things. No need to
resort to mocking comrades during a discussion. Had you not had the first
two lines, it would have been fine. Thanks.

Solidarity,
Emmett

>OOUUCHHH!
>Did someone just say anarcho-capitalists is a type of anarchism?
>
>Lets go back to the roots of anarchy.  Now, if you think anarchy means
>freedom, then your wrong.  Those anarcho-capitalists think that and want to
>be free of government laws that oppress their ability to exploit others(they
>shouldn't worry, we're moving in that direction anyways).
>
>Anarchy, in Greek, means "No Rulers".
>
>Capitalists, or pro-capitalists, are all about ruling, controlling and
>owning.  Anarchy flies in the face of all this.
>
>Therefore, to say anarcho-capitalist is an oxymoron in its most extreme
>case.  Like saying I believe in democratic-dictators, or living-dead.
>
>I've heard the argument of anarcho-capitalists, and it is very sad.  They
>hate the government and list the reasons why it is illegitimate.  What makes
>it soooo sad is the very same argument they use to blast the state is the
>exact same argument to blast capitalism.
>
>Anarcho-capitalism is maybe the most conflicting term I have ever heard.
>
>Lets all pause, smile and be glad because we ain't members.
>
>Milutin
>
>
>--
>Terror rains drenchin', quenchin', tha thrist of tha power dons
>That five sided fist-a-gon
>
>