Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sun, 10 Aug 1997 16:56:04 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
n a message dated 97-08-10 08:46:25 EDT, [log in to unmask] (Ellie
Rotunno) writes:
<<
Sounds like his body is detoxing the clogged up neurons that accumulated
toxins as a result of the electrical assault from the magnets. I think
there is a physicist on this list. I hope he might post whether all
magnetic fields are actually electrical fields. I could be wrong about
this.
>>
Bob:
Bruno's a physicist, perhaps he'll respond?
In a message dated 97-08-10 09:51:47 EDT, [log in to unmask] (Stefan
Joest) writes:
<<
Bob, how about distributing large coils under your bed and feeding them
with a strong direct current? That would generate a strong magnetic
field (there are formulas to calculate its strength depending on the
number of windings of the coils and the current going through them).
>>
Bob
This is definitely not my area of expertise. I've forgotten 95% of what I
probably learned of magnetics in my hi school physics class & I'm a VERY new
student in this field. Nearly anything I respond here is opinion &
relatively poorly-informed opinion, at that. I'm responding 'cause your
questions massage my ego. & it's Interesting,! ;-)
Dr. Bonlie sez that when the first Rusky Cosmonauts returned to earth after
the first long space journey & they'd lost something like 80% of the mineral
content of their bones, we were told that was due to zero-gravity, no
weight-bearing exercise (no "weight", only mass). Later it was learned that
the loss was due to deficiency of magnetic field (the spacecraft was orbited
above the 10-20 mile thick magnetic field & the loss was stopped on
subsequent flights by installing devices such as you describe in the craft!
& all such craft since designed for extended space voyages have some sort
of magnetic-field replacer. Anyone know if this is true?
'ealth & 'appiness,
Bob
|
|
|