Jean-Louis Tu wrote:
> There are no more, no less "rules" for a raw-fooder than for a cooked fooder.
>  *If you eat large meals, you may experience some problems of food
> combination. Our ancestors didn't combine food and didn't eat large
> meals, so food combining is a compromise between natural eating
> and modern way of living.
>
>  *I suppose that, when our ancestors catched a large animal, they had
> a large monomeal of meat. But they probably didn't have 3 large meals/day,
> and anyway these were *monomeals* (hence, no problems of food
> combination).

In other words, regularity should not be an issue here?  I always did
think it was more of a way of adapting to the modern lifestyle rather than
anything else.  And you're right, I'm also having a tough time imagining our
ancestors going by their watch to figure out when to eat (or deciding
how to combine their meal, for that matter).