Karrie here:

Just thought that I would share this since the talk has been about cancer at
times.

>Part 1, CANCER: Doctor Cures Herself
>GARY NULL:
>Hello, everyone. I'm Gary Null. The show is NATURAL LIVING.

>Our current guest is Doctor Lorraine Day. Doctor Day is a surgeon.
>She is the former Chief of Orthopedics and Trauma at San Francisco
>Hospital. She discovered alternative cancer treatments when she got
>cancer. We're going to talk to her about what happens when someone
>gets cancer who is supposed to know better -- who is supposed to
>know all the answers. We'll see what she found out.

>Welcome to our show, Dr. Day.

>DR. LORRAINE DAY:
>Thank you very much.

>GARY NULL:
>Let's begin by taking a look at your knowledge before you found out
>that you had cancer, and what you thought of alternative healing, if
>anything, and what your journey allowed you to learn, and what you
>know now.

>DR. LORRAINE DAY:
>Well, as you pointed out, I've been an Establishment, orthodox
>medical doctor, in the center of academic medicine, for virtually
>all of my career.

>Ten years ago I thought alternative treatments were "quackery," just
>as we are taught in medical school.  There is tremendous peer
>pressure in the medical profession to make us believe that anything
>outside of drugs and outside of what we do in orthodox medicine is
>truly "quackery", and is not to be given a second thought.

>Well, when I started reading information outside of the medical
>literature (because I had been doing a lot of radio and television
>broadcasts on other medical topics), and a lot of the good folks out
>there started sending me information, they would say things like:

>   "Do you have any idea that there is a big cover-up in
>    cancer cures?"

>Of course, at first, I thought that this was not to even be
>discussed; and yet, I did read the information. And when I did, I
>realized that what we were being taught in medical school, and what
>even I was teaching my residents, was incorrect. We were way off the
>mark, and I wanted to find out why this information had been
>suppressed and denied to doctors.

>It was at that time that I started interviewing, on the radio, many
>"alternative" medical doctors about natural healing methods.
>And when I was in the midst of doing this, I found out that I,
>myself, had cancer.  And so, I had a great fear for about forty-five
>minutes, and then I realized that I knew what to do about this. And
>it was not chemotherapy or radiation or massive mutilating surgery.
>And I decided to embrace these natural, alternative healing methods
>that have been known for thousands of years, and to get myself well
>that way, rather than by being poisoned and burned.

>GARY NULL:
>Before this happened, did you find that there was a general bias
>against those treatments that are considered "complementary" or
>"alternative?"

>DR. LORRAINE DAY:
>Well, that's an understatement. The medical profession ridicules
>alternative medicine. And it turns out that they do so because they
>are totally ignorant of it, as I was. When I was ridiculing
>alternative treatments, it was because I had no knowledge of it and
>because you just jump on the bandwagon and do as you're told. Your
>average doctor who takes care of you out there is not involved in a
>conspiracy to keep you ill, but that is actually what he really
>does. He keeps you ill, rather than getting you well. But he is not
>involved in the conspiracy. He, or she, does NOT know. They are
>TOTALLY IGNORANT, just as I was ignorant. And the sad thing is that
>most doctors refuse to even investigate these alternatives because
>they have been so brainwashed into thinking that these treatments
>are no good.

>GARY NULL:
>By the way, this is not directly off the subject, but you might find
>this of interest.

>For a long time, many of the different therapies offered within the
>alternative field -- let's say, for cancer or for AIDS -- have not
>been really qualified, medically. Clinically, they have. There is an
>enormous amount of good evidence with the therapies of Dr. Revici
>and Dr. Gerson and Dr. Burton and Dr. Burzynski and other therapies;
>these provide lots of good clinical studies showing that their
>patients who had terminal illness, today don't have illness. And we
>only know, theoretically, what works within each of these programs.
>For instance, Dr. Revici gives copper and selenium in a particular
>way that is different. And there are a lot of dietary approaches:
>natural hygiene, macrobiotics, juice therapy, etc.  And I just
>finished, after all these years ... I did research in the 1970s that
>was right on the target of determining the efficacy of each: what
>really works within each therapy. And it was based upon energy.
>Now, with the new forms of physics that are at hand, and combining,
>with physics, the latest in engineering techniques, we've just been
>able to perfect a unit [of measure] ... and I'm going to start doing
>laboratory work in about six months where I'll actually take each of
>the therapies (including the therapy you use: the Gerson therapy),
>and see the vital life force that results from each of the
>therapies. For instance, we tested pork as a dietary factor, and it
>measured zero ....  And you could apply this to the measure of
>therapies, as well.

>In time, this method would help people to decide which of the
>alternative therapies would be best, because you could then test
>Dr. Burzynski's treatment which uses antineoplastins, Dr. Revici's
>refractory fatty acids, Dr. Burton's immune-augmentative therapies,
>and see which would be best when applied to that patient's life
>force. And when you give something to a patient that measures, not
>from 1 to 7, but which measures a minus 1, it deenergizes the
>person. It literally takes the life force out of them.

>This is the first time that anything like this has been done. It is
>going to be about six months to a year before I'm able to come up
>with enough good quality science that can be replicated, and then
>publish the results.

>DR. LORRAINE DAY:
>An interesting point that you brought up is about how bad pork is in
>the diet -- how it has no life force in it. All you have to do is go
>back to the historical origins [of the taboo against eating pork].
>Some of basics of this alternative information have been around for
>thousands of years. In fact, when you go back, historically, into
>the Bible, you'll see that people were told not to eat pork.
>So, some of these ideas have been around for a long time.