Kirt:
>It's all point-of-view I guess. To me the end of Guy-Claude/Meta is a very
>positive thing, a free-ing and a fresh start for instincto.
I wish it would, but until he dies (of what? With so young sexual partners
he won't even have AIDS :-|), I am not sure people will become less
fanatic.
I would really like to see a wide spread publication which deals more
objectively with diets, raw food etc., but I guess it wouldn't be
very popular. Either people are skeptical about changing their diet, or
they want perfect health, a protective guru, etc...
>Thanks again to JL for translating (and probably Deborah Boyar) and the
>summarizing.
You are welcome. Unfortunalety, Deborah is not on the list anymore.
I guess that, among the 60-70 americans on the list, a few would have
good translating skills from French into English, but how many are
interested in instincto/meta/pedophilia? At least, it was a good
exercise in English for me.
Stefan:
>This sort of journalism would not even shy to plainly twist reality to
>make the story fit. We have a newspaper here in Germany, that is gene-
>rally known to lie. Its name is "Bild" (picture in English).
I agree that the article was far from objective. In particular, it is
easy to choose the dirtiest parts, and write things, judgements in a
way to disgust people, and yet report facts accurately. But don't
compare L'Express with "Bild". If you have the time, go to an international
library and have a look at "Paris Match", it is closer to "Bild" (and
actually, I think that "Bild" is even worse).
>Say, your little daughter still likes to sleep in mummies and dads
>bed and one time the same happens to you. Of course we have to say
>clearly here, that penetration started by your daughter would never
>succeed without you having an erection.
...And you being naked, and probably having done a few "preliminaries"
(don't know if it is the correct word in English). And, again, how did
the girl learn those things if you hadn't taught her?
>Seems as if you would have to be a perfect character in order not to
>fail these 100% criteria. No problem with murder. That's easy to avoid.
>But the situation with pedophilia is more complicated. What you might
>have thought to be positive for the child may have been negative - so
>you were wrong and what you did was an abuse.
But you perfectly knew the risk. And I don't think such things might happen
if you think you are doing positive things. What is more likely, is that
you need you satisfy your own pulsions, and find the ideal, innocent
victim.
>Then, aggressivity decreased also with raw nutrition. Again a lot of
>instinctos watched this, including me. So if there is still a need for
>sex (and it would be strange if it disappeared completely) it is at
>least not aggressive, therefore most unlikely to harm the partner,
>whoever it is.
Don't forget the allegations about GC Burger's attitude towards his wife...
>For me it is highly probable that Mr. Bur-
>ter's mental problems and imbalances are due to his amalgam fillings.
And for me, his problems are due to an unresolved Oedipus complex.
That's the only explanation I see why he focused on that particular aspect
of psychology in his meta theory.
Best wishes,
Jean-Louis
|
