>As to my testiness. I guess it comes down to my perception of your
>perseveration on the cult aspect of these fringe diets. Its part of
>the territory.
I fail to understand the connection between your being testy and my
pointing out cult aspects of fringe diets.
>Question Authority, then Question Yourself, and compare notes at the
>pearly gates, you know?
You lost me here.
>I'll send you some of my blood and you can do whatever you want with
>it. I, of course, suggest you drink it straight away! :)
I will pass on your offer, but when the customs does release your
stuff, I would be very interested in knowing what the triglycerides &
cholesterol levels were for you & Melissa.
>>You must be kidding! It has only begun, if not here then in NH M2M.
>Whatever. I can't keep spending such an huge amount of time with these
>posts, esp when its so repetative (I'm to blame too!).
Well, you sure are playing to a different tune now. Only 2 posts ago,
on Saturday Sept. 14, you expressed that you 'enjoyed the challenge of
my responses to your mindset' and that you were 'interested in reading
my old 55k response' to you. After you read my response to your
comments on scientific research, where I expressed frustration with the
cult-like anti-scientific stance & the tunnelvision, so many people on
various dietary regimes seem to suffer from along with their tendency
to overidentify with their diets on the personal/emotional level, you
did a flip-flop and made my very point. I rest my case. :/
>I hear you about the cult stuff,
If you do hear me, why are you getting so defensive?
>but what else can I say?
A lot more I would hope.
>I'm burning out on it (posting) I guess.
Take a break. Posting here is supposed to be fun & inspiring not a
drudgery. It might also help you, if you in the future edit your
responses a little better.
>What's left, Peter?
A hell of a lot.
>Every criticism you have with instincto is fair.
Rather than flatter, it would be a lot more interesting, if you were to
respond more to the actual content of my postings.
>I have some you've not touched on (yet?), but I gotta leave something
>for M2M, no?
I look forward to you picking up in the NH M2M, where you left off
here. Especially, if you can reconnect with your lighter & more
spirited self.
>I guess in a way I'm trying to get this stuff (instincto lore) out of
>my system and get on with my raw life with the emphasis on life.
>Perhaps posting so extensively here, as well as finishing up the
>manuscript (which compete for time!), are my methods of "detox". I do
>think it's important stuff that deserves a fair presentation, but I
>feel like I'm just about finished doing my bit for future historians,
>and there's no reason it shouldn't be a bestseller. ;)
I wish you the best of luck. Hopefully, contributing to the NH M2M will
not be such a drain for you.
>BTW, I talked to the Nature's First Law fellas at a "granola" fair
>near here. They were funner in person than in their book. One of them
>had heard of veg-raw. I wish they'd post a bit.
That should lively things up.
>I thought that maybe I should send them a couple of the "scarier
>issues" of H&B and some references but why should I go to the trouble?
Especially since Health & Beyond is on the web.
>They've got _the_ answer and it'll be awhile before they're in
>listening mode.
Maybe when they start crashing from their sugar high.
>After seven years raw, I can soundly conclude, that like democracy, it
>sucks---but its better than the alternative. :)
I believe that we can do better than that.
>Cheers,
>Kirt
Best, Peter
|
