INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Date:
Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:27:11 +0200
Reply-To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Le explication de Gode pro le particulas in [ ] in le IED
From:
Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask] h.edu>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
12:17 1-4-2014, Mulaik, Stanley A:
>Mulaik scribeva isto in su Ha le IED errores?:
>
>Non le minus,

Nevertheless?

>fin al ultime momento, Gode habeva intendite a includer solmente
>particulas latin in le IED.

12:17 1-4-2014, Mulaik, Stanley A:
>Dr. Alexander Gode in un littera a Stanley Mulaik, le 27 de
>novembre 1961 scribeva:
>[...]
>[...] In this daydreaming, I foresaw trouble for my friends in
>the matter of grammatical words, which are and are not
>vocabulary and which are and are not grammar.

E "grammatical words" = particulas, nonne?

--
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2