INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:00:17 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Si ego me non equivoca le parola ab initio era "nove", ma li usatores de
interlingua senteva un besonio differentiar inter nove - que non es
vetere - e novem que es le numeral. Ego ha nulle problema con le focto
que on non-conforme al regulas de selection de parolas in interlingua
seligeva novem directemente del latino classic! Naturalmente un sage
action.

Den 2020-02-24 kl. 12:05, skrev Ruud Harmsen:
> Novem, intertanto, post le addition de esperanto-anglese (Paul Denisowski) e francese-interlingua (Piet Cleij).
>
>
> --
> Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
> http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html



--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2