<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>
Jane Oswaks wrote:
> My test results came back as follows:
> Anti-endomysium - negative
> Anti-Gliadin, IgA - negative
> Anti-Gliadin, IgG - positive 1:19
> My doctor doesn't think this means anything...do you???
First of all, let me make it clear that this is the opinion of layperson.
You indicated that your daughter was diagnosed as a celiac about five
years ago. During that time, she has presumably been on a gluten-free
diet. What about you? Odds are, you've been on a low-gluten diet, a
natural consequence of living with a celiac. If you are an undiagnosed
celiac yourself, then your system is not getting as much gluten as most
undiagnosed celiacs would get. As a result, your immune system might
very well show less of a response--thus the ambiguous test results.
I'd hesitate to dismiss these results too quickly. Perhaps you should
make a conscious effort to eat a lot of gluten for the next several
months, and try the blood tests again. I believe the IgA level responds
fairly quickly to the presence or absence of gluten in a celiac's diet,
so if you are an undiagnosed celiac you might test positive for IgA
after an intentional gluten-challenge. Also, there would be more damage
to the villi, so that a follow-up small intestine biopsy would be more
conclusive.
I'm in a similar situation. I have the genetic markers for celiac
disease, but so far I don't have the disease. However, since I live
with two children that do have celiac disease, I probably consume much
less gluten than the average. If I ever do show symptoms of celiac
disease, I'm probably going to have to make a conscious effort to add
gluten to my diet so I can conclusively prove whether or not I have it.
If I were you I'd pursue this further, in spite of your doctor's apparent
lack of concern about the chances of you having celiac disease.
--------- Jim Lyles ----------
--- [log in to unmask] ---
---- Holly, Michigan, USA ----
|