Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri, 31 Mar 1995 03:38:45 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>
Norman Dewar <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>This may seem a trivial question but why is the word disease
> used in connection with celiac. Personally I feel I have a live
> long condition but I don't have a "disease" . It isn't in many
> ways a disease in the typical sense of the word.
Personally, I couldn't agree more. I tell people my son has 'Celiac' or
'Celiac Sprue', and I don't want my son (age 8) to think of himself as
having a disease.
In a light hearted way, when I talk about Celiac with others, I sometimes
say that THEY have 'Arsenic Disease' since their metabolism is such that
arsenic is toxic to them. Gluten just happens to me far more common in
food than arsenic.
I realize that this is a stretch, but it tries to make the same point as
Norman did:
> People think if you have a disease, you are sick but I'm not sick
> (or a least not very often)
Bill Elkus
|
|
|