BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date:
Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:09:09 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Off-Topic Messages -- Subject Lines
From:
Buddy Brannan <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines) 
Heh. You sent to the wrong blind-hams list. 

--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Mobile (preferred): (814) 431-0962
Phone: (814) 860-3194
Email: [log in to unmask]
"We are all just walking each other home." 



> On Mar 31, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Steve <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> BlankHey Guys,
> 
> We've always tolerated some Off-topic traffic as long as it is technical, at 
> least tangentially.
> 
> But, what I don't like to see is non-descript subje ct lines.
> I've recently seen several messages with a subject line of "off-topic" —— so 
> please, be more descriptive.  It'll help those who aren't interested in that 
> particular topic to just hit the delete key along the way; and it will help 
> those of us who tend to skim to maybe stop and offer some help -- if we had 
> known more about the subject in question.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> And, if there's anybody who would like to help me co-mod, let me know off-list.
> 
> Steve
> 
> Lansing, MI

ATOM RSS1 RSS2