BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:14:35 -0500
Reply-To:
Lloyd Rasmussen <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<BCF827FA10944091B940175885B203FE@lras10>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
Lloyd Rasmussen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Removing your message to see whether this prevents mine from being loaded 
with equal signs, etc.
Mike, VO1AX, owned an FT-450 (not the D model) 2 to 3 years ago and ran it 
as a remote station. He should have a lot more information than I do. The 
450 series has some of the features of the 950 I use, but with fewer 
options. I think you only have a couple of receiver selectivity options, 
three fixed mike gain settings, keypad cannot be used for frequency entry, 
etc. The defaults are pretty good for SSB and CW. When I was in the market 
for a new transceiver to replace my Drake C-line in 2008, I decided that the 
FT450 didn't have enough flexibility to suit me. So I ended up with a rig 
with no built-in voice output at all, but a lot of capabilities.
Anyway, I don't remember whether we have any other FT450 owners on the list, 
but I think it could make a good general-purpose radio.



Lloyd Rasmussen, Kensington, MD
http://lras.home.sprynet.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2