sadly P25 is the "way of the future"! most of the major law enforcement in
Australia is now P25 phase 1 or phase 2, and yes it is mostly encrypted.
you can get a digital decoder [both a hardware or software solution] for the
unencrypted streams but, trying to find of the unencrypted streams is almost
impossible!
73 from IC.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: P-25 audio?
> Completely agree Jim. I get that garbled stuff as well and wondered
> if that wasn't some sort of encryption. Maybe just garble! Chicago
> P D is still running UHF analog and it is sure easy to understand! I
> wonder if my scanner needs a better antena than the whip on the back,
> but don't know what to look for. Something inside - not going to
> bore a hole through the brick for that!! Not to sound like an old
> fart, which I guess I am, but it is a wonderful time for technology
> but hard to keep up!
> PatAt 10:02 AM 11/28/2015, you wrote:
>>Yah Pat, we have P-25 here too and sometimes it's just a bunch of
>>garble, you know, like Greta Garble, smile. But, it is what it
>>is, whatever that means so we must live with it and hope they
>>don't just all go encrypted! Jim WA6EKS
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:33:29 -0600
>>Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?
>>
>>And what concerns me Jim is which digital protocole will
>>survive? Yaesu has theirs and of course, Icom has Dstar, and
>>perhaps
>>that's not all the entries. And our local police are a part of a
>>Motorola, state-wide P25 system and I struggle to hear what is
>>being
>>said. These old ears don't hear all that well any more, even
>>with
>>overpriced hearing aids!
>>Pat, K9JAUAt 02:12 AM 11/28/2015, you wrote:
>>Oh, well I for one am not yet interested in digital radio. I
>>wonder if it will develop into a flap like when, in the fifties,
>>people were changing from AM to SSB? Yes I know digital offers
>>infinitely more possibilities than that transition, but it is
>>still worth investigating before jumping into it particularly
>>because of the accessibility questions that so often plague blind
>>folks these days. 73, Jim WA6EKS
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>From: Dustin Thompson <[log in to unmask]
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:04:07 -0600
>>Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?
>>
>>The DStar trip bander, or that's was the word at a ham convention
>>and the DS=
>>tar mailing list...=20
>>
>>73 Dustin KF5VXR
>>
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2015, at 1:56 AM, Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]
>>wrote:
>>=20
>> What=3D20new=3D20Kenwood?=3D20Jim=3D20WA6EKS
>>=20
>> -----=3D20Original=3D20Message=3D20-----
>> From:=3D20Dustin=3D20Thompson=3D20<[log in to unmask]
>> To:[log in to unmask]
>>
>>Date=3D20sent:=3D20Sat,=3D2028=3D20Nov=3D202015=3D2000:55:54=3D20
>>-0600
>>
>>Subject:=3D20Now=3D20that=3D20Thanksgiving=3D20has=3D20come=3D20a
>>nd=3D20go=
>>ne=3DE2=3D80=3DA6
>>=20
>>
>>Now=3D20that=3D20Thanksgiving=3D20has=3D20come=3D20and=3D20gone,=
>>3D20has=3D=
>>20anyone=3D20Heard=3D
>> =3D20
>> anything=3D20about=3D20the=3D3D
>> =3D20New=3D20Kenwood=3D20yet???????
>>=20
>> 73=3D20Dustin=3D20KF5VXR
>
>
> -----
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4842 / Virus Database: 4447/11079 - Release Date: 11/28/15
>
|
