Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:51:06 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello again, Denis,
I disagree about archiving. Documents can be stored electronically
such that they can be read serially and retain structure. HTML is
best for this, with XML to be added in the future. It's not always
satisfactory if documents are stored as PDF, since PDF to HTML
conversion does not always work well, as we were discussing earlier
in the thread. Similarly storing documents as MS Word documents
has the same problem that conversion to HTML does not always work well.
Cheers,
John
--
In message <001f01c0b140$08c89400$17dcc241@deniscomputer>
Denis Anson via [log in to unmask] writes:
>While serial reading may allow faster intake of information, it isn't
>possible without modern electronics. You can't easily archive "printed"
>material in a way that allows for serial reading. And a great deal of
>the world's information is archived in printed format, and that is the
>format for which a great deal of information is destined.
--
Access the word, access the world! -- Try our WordAloud software!!
John Nissen, Cloudworld Ltd., Chiswick, London, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 845 458 3944 (local rate in the UK)
Fax: +44 (0) 20 8742 8715
Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://www.cloudworld.co.uk and http://www.wordaloud.co.uk
|
|
|