Getting that kind of data out of those companies would be about like getting
the truth out of Donald Trump!
Tom Fowle WA6IVG
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:54:55AM -0800, Jim Gammon wrote:
> Jim, I used to hear figures from the Nfb and/or AFB that some 10
> to 15 percent of the blind population used braille and that was
> measured from the working age blind, which would reduce your
> population even more. It would be interesting to collect data
> from all the companies who sell braille equipped notetakers, and
> braille displays to see just how many are in use and then again
> how to find out how many of those are really being used by the
> people who have them. Jim WA6EKS
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Shaffer <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 05:49:25 -0600
> Subject: Re: Accessibility of APRS?
>
> Another part of the problem is that one accommodation doesn't
> work for all
> folks. I much prefer operating my station, which now includes a
> Flex radio
> by the way, using a 40 cell braille display. When I'm using the
> radio, I
> turn my computer's speech off. But look at all the blind folks
> who either
> don't know braille, or don't use it.
>
> And then there's the problem of market share. I've heard the
> claim that 15%
> of the population has some disability. But does that represent
> 15% of the
> market? That's what businesses really need to look at. As we
> all know, the
> disabled are also economically disadvantaged. Also, when I
> encounter
> figures like the one I've cited, I wonder what demographics they
> represent.
> Is, for example, a large percentage of that 15% over 70 years
> old?
>
> So in addition to having divergent accessibility needs, we have a
> diminished
> market share.
> --
> Jim, KE5AL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Oyen
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 1:06 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Accessibility of APRS?
>
> like I said elsewhere, it seems counter intuitive. However, once
> a =
> population of a specific disability type reaches a certain number
> =
> (critical mass), manufacturers start to get forced to pay
> attention.
>
> There are exceptions (such as apple).
>
> Still, about the only way that we are going to get paid any
> attention is =
> if we can demonstrate numbers.
>
> One other thing, It seems that products specifically marketed to
> the =
> blind tend to be anywhere from 3x to 12x more expensive, even
> though the =
> cost to make said products is the same (or less) than
> conventional =
> products. This also needs to be changed. If accessibility were
> designed =
> in from minute one and marketed to every one, there would be no
> market =
> disparity that currently exists now.
>
> Take for example the SDR radios out there. In nearly all cases,
> you a =
> computer. THere are a lot of hams that would USE an SDR if they
> didn't =
> have to worry about the computer. Now comes HamPod. It acts as
> the =
> hardware interface that so many hams like. no need for a
> computer. that =
> means WE can use it. If I had about $1200, I would get an
> Allicraft K3 =
> or KX3 and a HamPod. At that point, I wouldn't need to use a
> screen =
> reader machine for most operations. At least, I wouldn't be the
> only ham =
> that the HamPod would need to be marketed to. Besides, its a
> blind ham =
> developing the device. :)
>
> DE n7zzt Eric
>
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Jim Shaffer wrote:
>
> Eric, getting all our blind friends to become hams wouldn't do
> it =
> either.=20
> For example, look at all the products that are not accessible,
> for =
> example,=20
> the Keurig 2.0 coffee brewers. Are there even any accessible
> new =
> Sirius/XM=20
> radios?
> --
> Jim, ke5al
> -----Original Message-----=20
> From: Eric Oyen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:42 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Accessibility of APRS?
> =20
> actually, there is a way.
> method 1: use a concurrent table that contains columns for
> station ID, =
> =3D
> LAT, LONG, DIrection of travel, Velocity, etc.
> =20
> method 2 might involve using an app like apple maps (on their
> iPhone) =
> =3D
> which can tell the location of a pointer on the map (used in
> turn by =3D=
>
> turn navigation).
> =20
> Honestly, I think the first method is easier to achieve.
> =20
> The problem with map description is that it needs a lot of
> information =
> =3D
> not easily presentable and also needs a large amount of
> bandwidth for =
> =3D
> retrieval of location specifics in real time.
> =20
> I have noticed this issue about a lot of the digital mode
> software for =
> =3D
> ham radio. almost none of it is properly accessible for the
> blind =3D
> (especially dm88 in HRD). getting anyone to acknowledge that we
> (as a =
> =3D
> community of hams) even exists is starting to become a full time
> job =3D=
>
> (and sometimes even major frustration as I get the impression
> that =
> they =3D
> don't want to hear from us).
> =20
> perhaps what we need to do is to find every blind person we can
> and =3D
> encourage them to become hams. The larger our population in a
> specific =
> =3D
> population market, the more we get listened to. Its simple,
> direct and =
> =3D
> easy to do.
> =20
> DE n7zzt Eric
> =20
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:05 PM, John Miller wrote:
> =20
> I've experimented with APRS and I don't see a way, It shows
> actual =3D
> maps on=3D20
> the screen with people pinpointed on them, nothing is described
> that =
> I =3D
> can=3D20
> tell except maybe longitude and latitude and I'm not even
> totally =
> sure =3D
> about=3D20
> that for sure. I don't see it being able to be accessible in
> it's =3D
> current=3D20
> state and not sure there's really any way they could make it =3D
> accessible.
> =3D20
> -----Original Message-----=3D20
> From: Matthew Chao
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:08 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Accessibility of APRS?
> =3D20
> Hi, Folks. I have a Kenwood TMV710A which has APRS. Is there
> any
> way to make APRS accessible? Thanks.--Matt, N1IBB.=3D20=20
> =20
> =20
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> software.
> http://www.avast.com
|