BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthew Chao <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:13:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
If it wasn't a free site, then why would handiham.org be promoting 
it?  It is free.--Matt, N1IBB.

At 11:36 AM 7/10/2015 -0700, you wrote:
>Mike, I think that www.remotehams.com is a free site. I could be wrong.
>Handihams is giving very serious consideration to switching their two remote
>base stations to that site because it seems to be much more easily navigated
>than the current software they're presently using. If it's true that it does
>cost one-thousand dollars a year to use it, I really don't think that
>Handihams would tuch that idea with a million foot pole! Neither would or
>could I! All I know is what I have read in the handiham e-letter. That's my
>nickle's worth on the subject. 73. Doug, N6NFF
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Ryan
>Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:06 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Remote Hams
>
>Hi all:
>
>Isn't remote hams about a thousand bucks USD a year plus an aditional cost
>of how much air time each user wants on a nightly basis?
>If you Guys got that kind of money to spend wouldn't it be better to get
>your own Elecraft remote package for about 8500USD and enquire of possible
>places where it could be setup?
>
>73:
>Mike DE VO1AX
>
>Sent with AquaMail for Android
>http://www.aqua-mail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2