BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:49:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (330 lines)
Tom,

My dos pesos:


I've used the MSE for several years on a Windows 7 desktop. I let it set 
up in it's default configuration, and it does a quick scan once a week. 
   A couple of times it has found and removed something or other.

I should probably do this more often, but every so often, I start the 
program manually and  do a full scan.    There have been 2 times when 
it found something in the full scan that may have eluded the quick scan. 
    I can't be 100 percent sure of this, but a full scan every so often 
  might be a good idea.

BTW, last week I got the plaque from the Virginia QSO party for high 
score outside  Virginia.    This is the fourth year in a row.  Maybe I'm 
the only one outside VA sending in a log.

I'm hearing 6 meters open now to MO, KS, and OK  from south eastern PA.

73, Steve KW3A

On 7/13/2015 4:18 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
> Well, Ed, I may have just done that to some extent here.
>
> I've decided to go with a combination of Microsoft Security Essentials, and
> Malwarebytes at least for now.
>
> I may actually be replacing this 5 year old Windows 7 home PC at some point
> within the next year or so anyway, so don't want to put a whole lote more
> money into it if I don't have to.
>
> Anyway, the computer continues to be working now, so life is good and back
> to normal, at least for the time being.
>
> Thanks to all on the list for the great suggestions.  I have kept notes on
> what has been shared, so it will be handy for future reference if needed.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Ed Malmgren
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:00 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>
> Okay Tom, with all the opinions why not just right them down and shuffel the
> deck, pick one  hope for the best and be happy hi hi.  73
>
>
>
> ED K7UC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Behler
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 8:37 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>
> Thanks for the clarification,Steve.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Dresser
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:17 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>
> Tom,
>
> I think he means Nod32.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: July 13, 2015 09:53
> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>
>
>> Gerry:
>>
>> I've never heard of this one, and I'm not sure the name came through
>> correctly.
>>
>> Can you re-send?
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Gerry Leary
>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 8:03 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>>
>> Try and 0D 32
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone this time=20
>>
>>> On Jul 12, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> =20
>>> I had McAfee for a time back probably about 4 or 5 years ago, but I
>>> found i=
>> t
>>> did not work well with Jaws, so I scrapped it for other options.
>>> =20
>>> I actually looked at it again today, when at our local Staples store,
>>> but  decided not to buy it because of the negative experiences I had
>>> previously=
>> .
>>> =20
>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=
>>
>>> On Behalf Of Andy Baracco
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:47 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>>> =20
>>> Well, the Window Eyes folks tell us to stay away from McAfee, but at
>>> least=
>>
>>> at work I have no choice, so I make it work, and it does.
>>> =20
>>> Andy
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tom Behler
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 2:13 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>>> =20
>>> Jim:
>>> =20
>>> All I know is that the Freedom Scientific Tech Support folks have told
>>> me t=
>> o
>>> stay away from Avast, due to known issues with Jaws.
>>> =20
>>> What is interesting to me is that I used it for a time, and didn't
>>> notice  any issues, but I'm almost afraid to go back and try it now,
>>> since I think=
>>
>>> I've finally got my Windows 7 home PC up and running as it should be.
>>> =20
>>> I can't speak to the accessibility or inaccessibility of Avast, since
>>> my  sighted XYL helped me install it, and I just let it run in the
>>> background.=
>>
>>> I think it was working, although I might not have run it long enough
>>> to  really be sure.
>>> =20
>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=
>>
>>> On Behalf Of Jim Shaffer
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 4:28 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>>> =20
>>> I'm curious about a couple of claims about avast.  First, I use avast,
>>> and=
>>
>>> have installed a new version of JAWS and updated it without having to
>>> disable avast.  Secondly, I haven't found avast accessible at all.  Am
>>> I  missing something?
>>> =20
>>> thanks
>>> --
>>> Jim, ke5al
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tom Behler
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:22 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>>> =20
>>> Howard:
>>> =20
>>> I was actually very seriously thinking of Viper, until I heard from
>>> others=
>>
>>> that the latest version isn't accessible with Jaws.
>>> =20
>>> I could roll back to an earlier version, but who knows if the virus
>>> definitions would be kept up to date in the older version.
>>> =20
>>> I am thinking of going back to avast, but really don't want to have to
>>> remove it when updating or reinstalling Jaws.
>>> =20
>>> Some have suggested Avira to me, and I'm seriously considering that.
>>> =20
>>> Others have suggested Panda, but I don't know much about it.
>>> =20
>>> It amazes me that this is so difficult!  (smile)
>>> =20
>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=
>>
>>> On Behalf Of howard kaufman
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:15 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Antivirus
>>> =20
>>> Tom, you will get many opinions here.
>>> The vipre people are very helpful, and their software worked well with
>>> screen readers, that is until the 2015 version.
>>> Sometimes it takes over the entire micro processor, and you loose speech.
>>> That was with window-eyes system access and nvda.
>>> The 2014 software with the 2015 deffinitions works fine, but they will
>>> hav=
>> e
>>> to send you a link to the older software.
>>> Avast works very well, but you have to disable it when you install or
>>> upgrade jaws.
>>> The program interface is very navigable with jaws, so adjustments can
>>> be  made.
>>> I don't personally think much of AVG, and microsoft doesn't recommend
>>> security essentials as a primary protection method.
>>> Who am I to argue with them?
>>> Anyway, for what its worth, those are my thoughts.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=
>>
>>> On Behalf Of Tom Behler
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 11:02 AM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Off Topic: Antivirus
>>> =20
>>> Hello, all.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> I know this might be considered off topic, but then again, if you get
>>> a  virus, and your computer becomes non-functional so that you can't
>>> post to  the list, I guess my question can be considered to be  relevant.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Anyway, I'm wondering what basic anti-virus prrogram people on the
>>> list us=
>> e?
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> As you may recall, I have had a number of issues with my home Windows
>>> 7 PC=
>>
>>> this summer, but I think they have now been resolved, and I want to
>>> get a  good anti-virus program back on that machine before I start
>>> using it  regularly again.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> I've posted quiries to the two Jaws lists I'm on, and opinions vary
>>> widely=
>> .
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> I'd prefer a free program, but will pay for one if that would be the
>>> best.=
>>
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> I've not had the greatest luck with A V G, since the latest update
>>> seemed t=
>> o
>>> slow my system down considerably, and I also found it did not catch
>>> everything.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> I tried Avast for a while, but the folks at F S suggest that
>>> sometimes,  Avast can conflict with Jaws, although I didn't exxperience
>> this issue.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Others have suggested Avira,  Viper, Panda, and Microsoft Essentials.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> I guess sometimes it just boils down to the luck of the draw, but I
>>> like t=
>> o
>>> be as informed about these sorts of things before making a decision.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> I'm  using Jaws 16 with Windows 7.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> http://www.avast.com
>>> =20
>>> I'm not wearing a diaper, so don't try to change me.=20
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2