BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthew Chao <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 May 2015 16:28:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
>Straight from the designer's mouth, as it were.  Good to know the 
>internal tuner's limitations.  So, with that in mind, will mull over 
>all the advice you guys gave me regarding external tuners.  Hope 
>this helps the rest of the list.  Thanks.--Matt, N1IBB.




>Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 14:27:09 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
>From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Poor SWR on Lower Band, Hard to Fix
>X-Originating-IP: [65.175.128.136]
>To: "Matthew Chao" <[log in to unmask]>
>X-Mailer: IncrediMail (6295203)
>X-CMAE-Score: 0
>X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=XtVN4uAV c=1 sm=1 
>tr=0        a=BOZPBUx1l9bbC3sAgXPf4g==:117
>  a=YR44dIR8x58mjDuzFWK23A==:17  a=_id8MiM9JdAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10
>  a=Qw34IrfVAAAA:8 a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8      a=-9mUelKeXuEA:10 a=h1PgugrvaO0A:10
>  a=v4sx18N2AAAA:8       a=fOFkFmkidmR_mL9M7E0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 
> a=o1OHuDzbAAAA:8
>         a=uQMVzzaXasrf7bo3pskA:9 a=yHE73gMT_KGtaj9I:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10
>X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000
>X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
>  engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000
>  definitions=2015-05-04_04:2015-05-04,2015-05-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0
>X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
>  suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 
> classifier=spam adjust=0
>  reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1505040207
>Original-recipient: rfc822;[log in to unmask]
>
>Hi Matt
>  The internal tuner can handle SWR of 3:1 or less and in all Multi 
> Band Antennas it will be higher in some parts of most of the bands. 
> I use a MFJ 929 also a MFJ 993 both auto tuners and will tune 
> everywhere I have tried. Good Luck !! Joe
>
>
>
>
>-------Original Message-------
>
>From: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>Matthew Chao
>Date: 5/4/2015 11:57:03 AM
>To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>Subject: Poor SWR on Lower Band, Hard to Fix
>
>Hi, Joe.  My name is Matthew Chao (callsign N1IBB), and I bought and
>installed your Ultralite Junior, which I like a lot.  I have it
>hooked up to a Kenwood TS480SAT which has its own auto antenna tuner.
>
>The antenna is strung between two trees and my house.  It has a 4-1
>balun running into the ladder line.  My problem is that I'm unable to
>tune up between 3.525-3.85MHZ.  Additionally, because of the nature
>of the installation, I can't mess around with the feedline much.  How
>might I get the lower coverage?  Will an external auto tuner do the
>trick?  I'm looking at this possible solution because I am totally
>blind, and therefore can't use a manual tuner.
>
>Thanks in advance for any ideas you might have in solving this
>problem.--Matt Chao, N1IBB.
>..
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2