I'm happy, now my wife will get a vanity callsign. kb1zwz is horrible.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated


> It does sound that way.  A friend passed it on to me and I thought that
> some guys on the list might be interested so I put it on the list.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of John Miller
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:38 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
>
> It's the same thing. If they're doing away with it for one they're doing
> away with it all together.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:26 AM
> Subject: FW: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
>
>
>> Subject: RE: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated (TCW)
>>
>> This is very interesting and not totally clear. There are two distinct
>> fees regarding Vanity Call Signs; the initial application fee and the
>> renewal fee. This NPRM clearly states that the application fees are to
>> be eliminated but it is not clear if the renewal fees are also to be
>> eliminated. There is no redundancy in fee collections for renewals as
>> there is for multiple applications for the same call sign. Time will
>> tell.