BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:55:51 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (68 lines)
I doubt if you can hear the difference in .06 of a microvolt.  The big 
difference is selectivity, not nearly as good on uv5, for example.  The 
uv5, for example, is a software designed radio, which is not the same at 
all when comparing receivers.

73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Colin McDonald wrote:

> yeah it's a good radio...though mine is no where near as good a receiver as
> my baofeng GT3.
> The sensativity checks with a very very very high end piece of test
> equipment shows that the th F6A, both mine and another one specked out at
> around 0.18UV sensativity on VHF 2 meter band, and the baofeng GT3 specked
> out consistently at 0.12UV 12DB sinad on V and 0.11UV on UHF.
> So it's technically and audibly a better receiver, though perhaps not as
> good a radio for functionality.
> I still use mine on a daily basses though and the lithium battery is
> fantastic...still going strong and giving the same performance after 6 years
> of daily and heavy use.
> Now, if only I could locate a decent battery, for a decent price, that ships
> to canada for the IC T90A...my preference far and above the th F6A for
> performance.
>
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Byrne
> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 12:19 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Accessibility of Kenwood TH-F6A HT
>
> Richard,
> Absolutely acccessible.  As a totally blind guy I am very comfortable
> with the transceiver.  There is free Kenwood software which is nice
> also but I've always preferred to program mine from the front
> panel.  And yesm, DTMF.
> There is the new generation of Chinese, inexpensive handhelds which
> have some speech and are reputed to be pretty accessible but I've had
> almost no experience with them.  When all is said and done, the old,
> rugged, reliable Kenwood is a great way to go.
> Pat, K9JAU
> p s and there is a load of documentation at the usual sites.At 12:52
> PM 1/10/2015, you wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>>
>> Generally, I am wondering about how accessible this HT is?  Does anyone
>> have
>> some experience they can share?  What about PC software which may be used
>> to
>> program it; and which is accessible, of course?  Does this HT have DTMF
>> functionality for use with EchoLink (and other types) nodes?
>>
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Richard KK6MRH
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2