BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:44:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Ok, Steve.

I'm on it!

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Steve Forst
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 7:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: anyone heard W1AW/KH8?

Tom,

Try 24.896 listening 1 up.   Better than the other 2  earlier today.

73, Steve KW3A

On 11/9/2014 6:31 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
> Steve:
>
> I finally did find W1AW/KH8 on 28.025 as our net ended, but he was 
> extremely light here.  Could copy the pileup 1 KC up fine, but couldn't
break through.
>
> Tried 21.027 a few minutes ago, and heard nothing from him, or any 
> associated pileup.
>
> My next shot will be 20 meters a little later if he is on.
>
> One thing that was a bit confusing was that he didn't identify very often.
> Just gave a 59, and indicated that he was operating split up 1 KC.  He 
> only seemed to identify once every 5 minutes or so.
>
> Anyway, I'll keep trying. ... It sure would be nice to have a tower 
> and beam for this kind of thing.  (grin)
>
> Hopefully, he will be on again for another week before the event ends, 
> but I don't know for sure.
>
> Will keep you and everyone posted.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Forst
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 5:14 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: anyone heard W1AW/KH8?
>
> Tom,
>
> If you didn't get him on 10,  check out 21.027- a bit stronger here 
> than the
> 28.025
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2