BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:49:30 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: It looks like bye-bye for Radio Shack.
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<146604EF995E424C8FD2AFBA569A21C7@n1umj71215edc0>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
I'm surprised they lasted this long.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Chao" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: It looks like bye-bye for Radio Shack.


> Interesting.  It's bad enough that their selection isn't the
> greatest.  The link sort of explains all that.--Matt, N1IBB.
>
> At 02:41 PM 2/3/2015 -0500, you wrote:
>>Forwarded message:
>>
>>I was just sent the following link about Radio Shack:
>>http://www.arrl.org/news/radioshack-s-long-slow-downward-slide-nears-the-end

ATOM RSS1 RSS2