BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:04:29 -0600
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<522EE1E579024F24A17C5FBA26E061A0@EdPC>
Subject:
Re: The value of our Blind Hams list
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
Ed Malmgren <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
Talking about all the unnecessary junk.  



ED K7UC
-----Original Message----- 
From: Alan R. Downing 
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 6:32 AM 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: The value of our Blind Hams list 

I wish to thank all of you that have written to me privately in agreement
with my objection to the many useless and unnecessary posts to this list.
Clearly I am not the only member that has a problem with the traffic level
on this list, and in particular, to all of the time-wasting posts to it.

73


Alan R. Downing
Phoenix, AZ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2