BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Albert Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:26:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Where is k h 8?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: anyone heard W1AW/KH8?


> Tom,
>
> Try 24.896 listening 1 up.   Better than the other 2  earlier today.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
>
> On 11/9/2014 6:31 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
>> Steve:
>>
>> I finally did find W1AW/KH8 on 28.025 as our net ended, but he was 
>> extremely
>> light here.  Could copy the pileup 1 KC up fine, but couldn't break 
>> through.
>>
>> Tried 21.027 a few minutes ago, and heard nothing from him, or any
>> associated pileup.
>>
>> My next shot will be 20 meters a little later if he is on.
>>
>> One thing that was a bit confusing was that he didn't identify very 
>> often.
>> Just gave a 59, and indicated that he was operating split up 1 KC.  He 
>> only
>> seemed to identify once every 5 minutes or so.
>>
>> Anyway, I'll keep trying. ... It sure would be nice to have a tower and 
>> beam
>> for this kind of thing.  (grin)
>>
>> Hopefully, he will be on again for another week before the event ends, 
>> but I
>> don't know for sure.
>>
>> Will keep you and everyone posted.
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators 
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Steve Forst
>> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 5:14 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: anyone heard W1AW/KH8?
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> If you didn't get him on 10,  check out 21.027- a bit stronger here than 
>> the
>> 28.025
>>
>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>
>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2