BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Nov 2014 11:16:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Tom,

I think one of the big problems with so much of this stuff is the lack of quality control.  I used to hear the same complaint about some of the "bargains" we used to see for computer hardware in the 1980s.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 19:59
Subject: FW: [KenwoodTS-590] cheap txco lasted 31 days


> Hi, all.
> 
> =20
> 
> I don=E2=80=99t know if this is just a fluke, but here=E2=80=99s a =
> rather dismal report on the Chinese T X C O module for the TS590.
> 
> =20
> 
> Will be worth monitoring to see if anyone else has similar issues.
> 
> =20
> 
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> 
> =20
> 
> =20
> 
> From: [log in to unmask] =
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:49 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [KenwoodTS-590] cheap txco lasted 31 days
> 
> =20
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I bought one of the cheap txco  from ebay.  It worked great for 31 days. =
> Then it died. It had a 30 day return policy.  I guess you get what you =
> pay for.
> 
> =20
> 
> Jeff   WO4R
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2