Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:36:58 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have learned a lot from this list. But, there are some pet pieves in
which I concur with some of what Alan said:
1. People who reply with one-line responses, and make several replies in a
row to different people. It'd be much better to consolidate your replies
into one message.
2. Messages that hijack the subject line; the subject line can be edited
too, so remember to change it if you are going in a different direction.
3. I don't mind looking at the list of check-ins, but some of the other
traffic should be exchanged directly like a QSL card.
I do like the reminders about the nets and if we have to cancel due to a
contest. Some day, maybe I'll get my antenna back up where I can get on and
check in; I tried demo-ing field day to a new ham and I could hardly make a
contact on 40 meters. I just have not gotten around to getting my wire back
up on either end after the ice storm, and I don't want to throw money at the
tower because it is hard to find decent climbers now.
Steve, K8SP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan R. Downing" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: The value of our Blind Hams list
> Hello guys.
>
> I too think that we have a good list here, but having said that, it is far
> too busy, and there are way too many comments made that are unnecessary.
> I
> intended to count the number of posts relating to the Victor Stream, but I
> couldn't count that high, HiHi. Really guys, do we really need that many
> posts regarding the Stream?
> Then we are subjected to any number of posts relating to the Saturday
> and/or
> Sunday nets. Other than the report regarding checkins from the net
> control,
> do we really need all manner of comments about it/them? And of course,
> there is the minor issue of inaccurate subject lines. What is up with
> that?
|
|
|