Hi John!
That's good advice! Yep, I'll bet I'll become annoyed by either rig
squawking too much ; ) I am impressed that you say the TS-2000 is good to
ride it in on. (In California, when we're surfing, there's always that one
last wave we "ride it in on" [to the shore, that is].) If it's good enough
for you, then I think I need some compelling reasons why it's not good
enough for me : )
Many thanks!
73,
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 Versus TS-590
You would have no problem, or no more problem learning the TS-2000 than you
would any other current radio. There is nothing you can't do with it just
because a couple things you have to count ckicks on the dial instead of
listening to it speak every time you touch anything. If you ask me, the
TS-2000 speaks too much, there should be a user and advanced mode because I
find it says too much. It took me 8 years to save for it though and it's the
last new radio I'll ever afford. I'll be very happy if it lasts the rest of
my life.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard B McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 Versus TS-590
> Hi Steve!
>
> This is very helpful advice. Yes, I am proceeding with upgrading to a
> General license. Well, since I really do not know which precise area
> of the hobby I want to settle into, I kind of want to explore them
> all. For that reason, perhaps the TS-2000 might be better?
>
> On the other hand, I am a little scared about the TS-2000's
> accessibility inferiority as compared to the TS-590; but either way I
> go I have a steep learning curve as it's all new to me - as you
> rightly point out : ( I'm pretty good with computers and technology,
> though, so I am confident in my skill sets. Am I incorrect to worry
> about the accessibility differences between these rigs?
>
> Yes, I am serious about my antenna plans. That said, I will be
> limited more by LA zoning rules than any other reasons. If I could be
> permitted, I would turn my property into a full-on aluminum farm ; )
> Stupid zoning rules!
>
> What a drag the VGS-1 won't drop into the TS-2000 : ) I wish Kenwood
> would roll the 590 technology into the 2000!
>
> I am *SO* perplexed! : )
>
> 73,
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Forst
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 9:05 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 Versus TS-590
>
> Richard,
>
> I have both in the shack, and a large number of folks on this list have,
> or have had both of these rigs. I'm sure you will get a lot of input
> on this, but it all comes down to what you want to do in the hobby.
>
> The 2000 came out as you might guess, in 2000, and while some internal
> changes have been made over the years, it is not the latest technology.
> I think the 590 came out in late 2010, for whatever that's worth.
>
>
> You can't use the new VGS-1 in the 2000. Won't fit, won't work.
>
> The 2000 is very accesible despite the older voice board, and the 590
> speaks a bit more. Since this is all new to you, you will have a steep
> learning curve with either one, but lot's of help on this list.
>
>
> The TNC in the 2000 is kind of limited, but it is there. Although I
> think the need for control software is a bit overblown, the free 590
> software works well with JAWS. The free software for the 2000 is
> only for menus and memories, but there is other stuff out there that
> works. Jim in Texas from this list has been working to get his radio
> control software working better for the 2000.
>
> I know you want to work all bands and get involved in all aspects of the
> hobby, but few if any hams really do that. You would be happy with
> either radio.
>
> Again, what do you want to do? Work local repeaters? or only Work
> stations across the country or around the world? I know you mentioned
> some big antenna projects. Realistic, or just caught up in the moment?
> Big antennas need big supports which means money and labor. If you
> are going to stay a Tech, the 2000 may be better. Unless you upgrade,
> or learn morse code, you have serious limitations on the HF bands that
> may not make the 590 practicle now. Of course, you may be rich, then
> you can buy one of each.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
>
> On 5/19/2014 11:22 AM, Richard B McDonald wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to decide which is a better rig for me between the
>> Kenwood
>> TS-2000 and the Kenwood TS-590. This breaks down into two
>> considerations:
>> 1) "accessibility" since I am blind and 2) radio functionality.
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as accessibility, from what I have read the TS-590 seems to be
>> a
> bit
>> more accessible. However, this difference seems to be small. One
>> thing I read from a accessibility review
>> <http://active-elements.org/2012/12/01/kenwood-ts-2000/> of the
>> TS-2000
> is
>> " The TS-2000 was fitted with the optional VS-3 voice chip. The VS-3
>> has been superseded by the excellent VGS-1 on newer Kenwood's, but
>> gave unparalleled access to Kenwood radios when introduced." Does
>> this mean
> that
>> the VGS-1 chip can be used in the TS-2000 to get its better performance.
>> Also, both rigs have a computer control software interface option.
>> How accessible are they with JAWS? Any comments about the
>> accessibility differences of these two rigs would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as radio functionality, the TS-590 seems to be a better HF rig
>> (160
> -
>> 6 meters); but that is all its got. On the other hand, the TS-2000
>> has a far more broader range of capabilities: 160 meters - 70 cm; 23
>> cm option, TNC, and on and on. From what I have read, the TS-2000 is
>> a very good HF rig; and the difference between it and the TS-590 here
>> are not all that great. So, what are your thoughts about the radio
>> functionality between these two rigs?
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
|
