Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:40:46 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That is not true, and I own a hampod and it will work with the K3, but none
of the flex radios.
Alan/KD7GC
Alan R. Downing
Phoenix, AZ
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of eric oyen
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 8:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Flex Radios?
there is a guy in northern california that makes a device called a ham =
pod. It can be programmed to interface with the flex (or other SDR). So, =
the company telling you the flex is graphical only is selling you a line =
of bull. Also, its not that hard to make a usable interface (they do =
have the coders for it). guess they just don't want the business of =
blind hams.
-eric
On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Alan R. Downing wrote:
> I have spoken to Flex directly, as well as to many users of both Flex =
models
> and the new Apache Labs model, and have been told that all information =
is
> displayed graphically, including by waterfall displays, and that =
access to
> blind operators is not possible. Rob Santello might have some =
understanding
> of this subject that he could share with us.
>=20
> 73
> Alan/KD7GC
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Alan R. Downing
> Phoenix, AZ
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators =
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Michael Ryan
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 11:35 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Flex Radios?
>=20
> Hi all:=20
>=20
> Has anyone ever accessed any of the flex radio transceivers with jaws =
or WE?
>=20
> I'm wondering how they'd do as an alternative accessible transceiver.=20=
>=20
> Mike VO1AX=20
|
|
|