BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 02:15:58 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
John Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Congratulations to KK5OZZ

John KB5HCT

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Rob,
>
> I owned a bad CW call once for 18 years so back in 1996, my first pick on
> the vanity call list was the one I received and I picked it strictly
> because
> of how it sounded on CW.  So, you got a dandy and maybe, some day, if you
> decide to, you can apply for one of your own choosing.
>
> Phil.
> K0NX
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob DeZonia" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 6:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Yay! It's here.
>
>
> > Well I was just tapping it out in my head, and granted I haven't done CW
> > since I was 17 and that was a few decades ago. Just seemed a little long.
> > But as far as I'm concerned, any Call is a great Call if it is mine. Grin
> > Rob
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2