Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 29 Nov 2003 16:58:45 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, what one can do is after hitting reply to all, move to the to field
and take out the persons address and leaving the list address.
At 04:22 PM 11/29/03 -0600, you wrote:
>Doing so I believe gives the original poster two messages, one for the list
>and another privately, but does insure it goes to the list though.
>
>Brad
>
>At 11/29/2003 on Saturday, you wrote:
> >I think it might be the way it is set up in their mail client. Many times I
> >use the reply to all and that takes care of it from this end.
> >
> >Vicki
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 1:59 PM
> >Subject: Re: Messages
> >
> >
> > > Pat, I have the same problem with Rhonda's messages and Carol's as well.
> > > I try to remember to check the edress before putting it in the outbox,
> > > but that's all I know to do.
> > > Kathy, the computer drop out
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> > > Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> > > Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> > >
John
Today I met with a subliminal advertising executive for
just a second. -- Steven Wright<*>
|
|
|