BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ron Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:30:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (130 lines)
Ah, sorry, you already addressed radar. I'm reading this thread after work and didn't complete it before resronding.

Ron Miller

> On Jun 3, 2014, at 5:01 PM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Yes they did, we're secondary users there and they're primary so they can, 
> and just about did, kick us off if they want to with little to no notice.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: FCC Releases Warning Notices to Several Radio Amateurs
> 
> 
>> You may be right about that, John, but didn't the FCC restrict amateur
>> operation on 440 because of possible interference with Radar?
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 13:39
>> Subject: Re: FCC Releases Warning Notices to Several Radio Amateurs
>> 
>> 
>>> I believe the military handles their own frequencies for the most part but
>>> I
>>> could be wrong.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 1:03 PM
>>> Subject: Re: FCC Releases Warning Notices to Several Radio Amateurs
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Besides, I doubt that the FCC is much interested in what hams do as long
>>>> as
>>>> it doesn't affect commercial or military frequencies.  The focus is more
>>>> on
>>>> politics and economics, not on good radio practice.
>>>> 
>>>> Steve
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 07:37
>>>> Subject: Re: FCC Releases Warning Notices to Several Radio Amateurs
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> They don't go after those groups and the 3.910 group around regions 1
>>>>> and
>>>>> 2
>>>>> and probably 3 because they know those people are going to keep it up 
>>>>> no
>>>>> matter how many letters and fines they get and the FCC doesn't have the
>>>>> resources to take the next step. The FCC doesn't want to waste all that
>>>>> money though why our government is nothing but a waste of money, but
>>>>> they
>>>>> don't want to spend the money to take these people to court because 
>>>>> they
>>>>> won't pay the fines and what not, only for these people to cry that it
>>>>> wasn't them and no one can prove one way or another and they'll keep
>>>>> doing
>>>>> the same thing weather licensed or not. They'd rather go after the ones
>>>>> that
>>>>> are fairly new to their attention where they might have some impact
>>>>> rather
>>>>> than the habitual people who take the warning letters and notices and
>>>>> frame
>>>>> them, hang them all around their shacks  then brag about them on the 
>>>>> air
>>>>> and
>>>>> post pictures online and what not. It's not worth bothering with them,
>>>>> they
>>>>> don't have the resources to go after them. Plain and simple, I'm sorry
>>>>> to
>>>>> say it but that's what the problem is. If you mess up a couple times or
>>>>> push
>>>>> your limits, a letter might scare you straight or a fine once, you keep
>>>>> doing it and become a regular, they're not going to bother anymore.
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Robert Ringwald" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 1:07 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: FCC Releases Warning Notices to Several Radio Amateurs
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kind of a waste of FCC time going after these guys for not identifying
>>>>>> =
>>>>>> when out here on the West Coast we have much worse stuff going on, on 
>>>>>> =
>>>>>> 3840, 75 meters. The worse jamming, swearing, foul language, threats, 
>>>>>> =
>>>>>> much worse than the CB band. And these guys appear to be adults.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is so embarrassing. What if someone is tuning around the ham bands 
>>>>>> =
>>>>>> thinking about getting a ham license? Or if some child is listening 
>>>>>> in.
>>>>>> =
>>>>>> 99.99% of the hams are law abiding. But the .001 percent of bad guys =
>>>>>> really give our hobby a bad name.=20
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Bob Ringwald K6YBV
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Ron Canazzi=20
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 9:25 PM
>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Subject: FCC Releases Warning Notices to Several Radio Amateurs
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Group,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Read this article.  It is interesting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.arrl.org/news/fcc-releases-warning-notices-to-several-radio-am=
>>>>>> ateurs
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --=20
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signature:
>>>>>> They ask me if I'm Happy, I say "yes."
>>>>>> They ask me "How happy are you?"
>>>>>> I say: "I'm as happy as a stowaway chimpanzee on a banana boat!"
>>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2