BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Inverted V?
From:
David W Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 08:20:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines) 
It will work sort of as a Vee-beam (half a rhombic) and will favour in the
direction of the smaller angle.

As others say, put it up and try it!

73

David W Wood 

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Scott Gillen
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2014 6:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Inverted V?

I may have found a house and have an antenna question for the group.   My
id=
ea is to use a dipole in a sort of inverted V. However instead of the legs
c=
oming straight down to the ground they would be at say a 45=C2=B0 angle.
So=
 it's sort of a typical inverted V but tilted over if that makes sense.
Any=
 opinions?  The opening of the V would be pointing North. Any idea what the
d=
irectionality would be? =20

73

Scott
ZL1CHM / N0HOK
Auckland New Zealand=20

Sent from my iPhone=

ATOM RSS1 RSS2