BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 May 2014 17:01:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
So do I!

Sent from my iPhone 5s!

> On May 27, 2014, at 4:57 PM, Doug and Sheilla Emerson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> I'd like to see a blind hams echolink net. If we were able to get permision 
> to use the handiham conference server, it has an IRLP connect to it. The 
> IRLP connect is node number 9008. That's channel 8 of the Vancover 
> reflector. Hope it happens. 73. Doug, N6NFF
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Butch Bussen
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 9:47 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Taking it to the air
> 
> I think it would be more fun on hf.  I don't hhave echo link.  I do have
> irlp though.
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
> 
> 
>> On Mon, 26 May 2014, Howard Kaufman wrote:
>> 
>> Echolink is fine with me.  That way it would be world wide, the hams with
>> out HF capabilities could join, and we wouldn't have to miss weeks because
>> of contests, nets, or thunder storms.
>> 
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2