BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: kENWOOD QUESTION
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 May 2014 07:19:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
The mobile will always have more power and honestly with the newer hand held 
radios having SMA jacks on them for antennas, I'd never hook one up to an 
outside antenna with any coax worth the trouble because decent coax would be 
heavy enough to snap the connector off. Other than a very short run, rg-58 
isn't worth the effort if you ask me.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Busch" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 12:28 AM
Subject: kENWOOD QUESTION


> Someone please feel free to educate me here if I'm wrong but if the=20
> TMV71A only gives access to the 2 meter and 440 meter bands, what makes=20
> it any more useful than the dual band HT's that afford the same access?
> I've heard a lot about the kenwood rig but have yet to hear anything=20
> that could be considered a significant advantage over a simple HT.
> thanks
> KC9UIE
> Jeff

ATOM RSS1 RSS2