BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Shaffer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:37:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
I do like a list where I feel I can post anything I want to the list as long 
as it has some relevance.  My complaint is the postings that essentially say 
nothing, such as "I agree", or "Well said", and other stuff like that. 
While those sentiments have their place, if you agree or just want to 
express a personal thought, send that to the sender off-list!

However, I like the ability to post, and read posts, that don't necessarily 
have to do with ham radio.  This is the blind hams list, and so blindness 
topics are, in my opinion, fair game.  It wouldn't make good sense, for 
example, for the ARRL to say that rag chews on the radio should only deal 
with ham radio matters.  We like to rag chew about whatever's on our minds.
--
Jim, KE5AL
-----Original Message----- 
From: Anthony Vece
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 8:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: this list

Now;
The list is what it is.
If their is something  someone doesn't want to read, delete it.
It's just like changing the frequency.
If you don't want to hear something change it.


Sent from my Verizon iPhone 5s!

> On Mar 18, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Michael Ryan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>=20
> My gripes with this list are the lengthy non ham radio threads, which =3D
> belong on the blind tech and cell phone/ipod related lists and the list 
> =3D=

> admin refusing to address the apple issue with sending mail to this =3D
> list.=3D20
> I don't think this would take months to repair and if the list had to be 
> =3D=

> brought off line for a week or 2 to fix this problem then why not do 
> it?=3D=
20=3D
>=20
> As for the lengthy non hr related topics, on other lists dedicated to =3D
> ham radio related equipment, the sender who would continuously post a =3D
> non list subject would be removed from the list.=3D20
> I really think that it would be best if the current admin or admin's =3D
> can't take the time to moderate this list and address the users issues, 
> =3D=

> then it should be past on to a group who can do it.=3D20
> On the moderating issue, I was explaining to a gentleman on the FT-102 
> =3D=

> yahoo group about how I couldn't read my manual because A I'm visually 
> =3D=

> impaired and B. the old manual couldn't be scanned because I didn't have 
> =3D=

> the right scanner or software and he basically gave me the business =3D
> about being like someone who was acting like a person who went into a =3D
> lawn mower store demanding I be sold a pare of shoes. <smile>=3D20
> He was kicked off the list for his comments. If I'm not mistaken, the =3D
> same thing happened on this list last year.=3D20
> A very heated discussion occurred regarding disability wages and so on 
> =3D=

> and there was some fowl language used in the back and forth replies. 
> LOL=3D=
20=3D
>=20
> Nothing was done, at least to my knowledge anyway.=3D20
> But that's the way this list goes, you either set digest or hit the =3D
> delete key. Just like ham radio.=3D20
> If you don't like what's being said, you have that big knob to turn. I 
> =3D=

> won't unsubscribe because, although not communicating with everyone, I 
> =3D=

> do communicate with a few and I've gotten some valuable assistance.=3D20
>=20
> 73:=3D20
> Mike VO1AX=3D20 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2