BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:00:14 -0500
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
<005f01cf93f6$454dacb0$cfe90610$@com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
"Dr. Ronald E. Milliman" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
A3 Business Solutions
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Dave, tell me more about the crank-up towers and tri-banders you guys used.
I would like our club to use something like that next year. Another club I
was active in used a tri-pod with a telescoping mast and a small tri-bander
that worked out quite well. The club I'm in now just put up dipoles for 40
and 20. They just didn't work very well. I much prefer double bazookas for
80 and 40 and a tri-band beam or quad for the other bands. If you can't get
the antenna up very high, the quad will outperform most beams.

Ron, K8HSY

ATOM RSS1 RSS2